Why Isn't "Blog" in the Blogger Spellcheck Dictionary?
So, I am still trying to figure out just what kind of subject matter I am going to be covering in this here blog.
The market on amusing anecdotes in the life of a NYC lawyer already appears to be cornered. Besides, there's really nothing all that funny about corporate law. (The five hours of driving required to get to and from a four-hour hearing at the federal courthouse in Central Islip, on the other hand, is pure comedy gold - but only in the right hands...)
And unless one maintains a complete cloak of anonymity, the whole blog as diary thing really doesn't work. I suppose that's partly why so many blogs end up discussing the same news headlines along with politics and commentary on other blogs. I am proud to say that, with the exception of meta-blogging contained in post such as this one, this page will be no different (for now at least). So bring on the absurd: whether it be news*, politics, or blogs (links omitted to avoid harassment).
* This guy had every right to refuse to fill the prescription - we here at Rumblings fully support the exercise of one's religious beliefs regardless of how silly we may think they are - failure to transfer the prescription, however, is absurdity of a different sort. What was the guy thinking? He chose a profession that requires a license - a license that itself accommodates both his religious belief (the right to refuse to prescribe medicine for certain purposes) but recognizes the rights of a patient to obtain the drugs prescribed to them (the ability to transfer prescriptions). And why did he have to ask the woman her purpose - if she wasn't using it for birth control - i.e., keeping up her use of the pill to avoid/maintain the pill's side effects while not actually having sex, would he have prescribed it?
<< Home